Saturday, December 3, 2011

The Bad Boys of Art


Frederick Childe Hassam, born in 1859, became arguably, the most important American Impressionist, and was also a pretty good example of pulling oneself up by one's bootstraps.  


Street in Portsmouth
The son of a prosperous banker, he was forced to leave school and get a job in 1872 after a devastating fire ruined his father financially.  

He was apprenticed to a wood engraver, and learned to draw, eventually creating illustrations for Harper's and the Century.  At night he attended classes at the Boston Art Club, studied with William Rimmer at the Lowell Institute, and took a few private painting lessons. 




At the age of 24, Childe visited Great Britain and the European continent for two months, to get a look at the Old Masters, and do a little watercolor painting in the English countryside.  It isn't difficult to imagine his desire to return after arriving home.  In 1886, he moved to Paris to study at the conservative school, The Academie Julien.


Today, Impressionism is appreciated by a vast number of people, even those who might not be particularly interested in art...



But in 1874, "Impressionism" was a derogatory term coined to describe paintings that were considered to be an assault upon traditional art and good taste. 




To critics, Impressionism was a revolutionary insurrection by artists



who were irreverent and had, quite frankly,




kind of a weird way of looking at the world.




The avant-garde style of that rogue gang of painters- Jean Claude Monet, Pierre-August Renoir, Camille Pissarro, Edward Manet, and Frederic Bazille, forever changed young Childe Hassam's ideas about painting.




Impressionism is focused on the relationships between form, light and color and showing movement and fleeting passages of time and atmosphere.   




It uses loose brush strokes, ordinary subjects and sometimes unusual compositions or visual angles,




and it was a radical departure from the realistic, polished paintings of the French school.




Childe moved back to New York in 1889.  His understanding of correct structural form and composition, and mastery of Impressionist technique eventually got his paintings noticed, and he became well-known for his landscapes and New York street scenes.



Today, we're used to artists who paint to shock.  But it's important to note that for the Impressionist revolutionaries, shocking as they were, that wasn't actually their intent.



Previously, art had been mostly religious, allegorical and political, and the creation of art had been directed largely by the rich and powerful.  




Before Impressionism, art had been used to teach lessons, promote the moralizations of the church, threaten, show the vast riches and superiority of those who could afford to commission it, titillate with veiled references to things one wasn't supposed to talk about, 



and portray things the average person couldn't have.



The Impressionists, however, painted beauty in daily life 


  
-shoveling snow on a cold but sunny morning, the bustle of a rainy evening, running errands. 


    
 Simple things and common moments that are free and available to everyone.  Why?




    Just because.




Beauty.  Unconventional, natural, free, and for no particular good reason.  Now that's revolutionary.




From our library:
                


If you happen to be in Williamsburg, VA between now and January 22nd.  Do stop in at the Muscarelle Museum of Art, and see the show, "Seeing Colors: Secrets of the Impressionists."  The fabulous Muscarelle is off of Jamestown road on the campus of the College of William and Mary.

6 comments:

Glamour Drops said...

It always fascinates me to imagine going back in a time machine and seeing these paintings at a time when the world was changing so much - with the industrial revolution and invention of the steam engine, etc. - and yet people really would not have been used to the concept of change as we now understand it. (Swift, I mean!) So radical, yes, this idea of bright colour, of painting landscapes just as they were, not contrived, and of capturing light and shadow as if by a photographic lens, which was yet to come in full glorious colour. Such imaginations they must have had - to take that great leap in art!

Thoroughly loved this post, and delightful to see it from an American perspective. I have only seen a little of Hassam's work, and none of these one you have used here. Now I am eager to see more. Virginia xx

Thoughts on Design said...

Wonderful post. There is a translucent flitered light qualilty to his work that is quite glorious. Hopefully the show will make up Boston way.

Cheers,
John

The enchanted home said...

Fabulous post......Impressionism is my absolute favorite expression in art. The colors, the light the subjects, it is just magical and breathtaking!
Wonderful post....

Donna in Potomac said...

Impressive! Hassam has been off my radar but you've convinced me to see more. I already have a few new favorites!

Virginia Country House said...

One of the most interesting things about the Impressionists, to me, is that for the first time in history, art was created for the sake of beauty alone. And to be hung in a house, not necessarily a church or public space. The revolution wasn't just about how they applied the paint to the canvas, it was about the new accessibility of art, and that upset a lot of people.

Karen said...

This is a wonderful post. It always surprises me to hear, while looking at such beautiful art, that an artist with such talent wasn't fully appreciated during his career. Much like some of the classical composers that essentially lived in poverty but now, hundreds of years later, their music is still entertaining.
Love this artist!
Karen

Post a Comment

Welcome, and thank you for stopping by! The best part of blogging is the dialogue between friends, so please share your thoughts, memories, stories and ideas with us. We love hearing from you.